松子#树洞

 找回密码
 进入松子#树洞

微信登录,快人一步

搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 5|回复: 0

What do you listen for before repairing artifacts?

[复制链接]

4

主题

4

帖子

30

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
30
发表于 昨天 15:14 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
I am putting together a small set of generated stems for a remote collaborator, and one vocal stem has a short raspy texture. The musical idea is fine, so I would rather not replace the whole take. For comparison, I reviewed the same two bars in isolation. To make the comparison fair, I kept an untouched stem with the notes. My collaborator needs to judge the writing and balance, not spend the first listen wondering whether the roughness is intentional. I have already checked the original export, renamed the versions clearly, and listened through speakers as well as headphones. The noise remains in the same place, although it becomes less obvious at lower levels. While looking for a clear starting point, I came across fixsuno.top and used it to frame the questions I should ask before touching the file. My tentative plan is to keep the source stem, make one restrained repair copy, and label the result so nobody mistakes it for a new performance. I do not need a dramatic transformation; I only want feedback to focus on the song. For people who exchange demos regularly, what is a practical handoff routine? Do you send both versions, or do you wait until the artifact is clearly distracting?
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 进入松子#树洞

本版积分规则

关注松子微信 轻松孕育不迷路
关注微信更多精选备孕用品优惠 松子大医生知名专家团队直播答疑

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|松子#树洞

GMT+8, 2026-9-18 17:27 , Processed in 0.035287 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表